05-18-2009, 09:11 AM
I still think the movie makers were pussies.
I don't disagree that Star Trek needed an infussion of balls but why Kirk? Its been done, its over, and it is time to move on.
They could have made the same movie but moved the universe of Star Trek forward. Going back will prove to be a huge mistake in the long run.
The could have made the same exact movie but started with a new captain. Just call the new captain Zak Bronson and build some new interesting people around him.
The bad guy in this movie is a joke anyway.
If you want a real story line lets put Star Fleet in real trouble over 3 or 4 movies. Have real bad guys, a new Darth Vader etc. Give us this generations Star Wars.
Vllad
I don't disagree that Star Trek needed an infussion of balls but why Kirk? Its been done, its over, and it is time to move on.
They could have made the same movie but moved the universe of Star Trek forward. Going back will prove to be a huge mistake in the long run.
The could have made the same exact movie but started with a new captain. Just call the new captain Zak Bronson and build some new interesting people around him.
The bad guy in this movie is a joke anyway.
If you want a real story line lets put Star Fleet in real trouble over 3 or 4 movies. Have real bad guys, a new Darth Vader etc. Give us this generations Star Wars.
Vllad